Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Image 1 of 1
Most of what passes for AI governance is a pile of boxes that grows faster than the AI does - and never quite governs it. Multiply it out: twenty frameworks, two hundred use cases, a thousand questions per checklist. Four million boxes. Even if you ticked them all, you still wouldn't be governed. You'd just be really really busy.
This primer is the opposite argument, in three moves, written by the author of Singapore's first AI risk management guidelines for the financial sector. For anyone trying to keep control of AI as the number of systems climbs, in a firm, a regulator, or a team of one.
This primer is the gateway to the fuller book, Some Thoughts on Scaling AI Governance.
Most of what passes for AI governance is a pile of boxes that grows faster than the AI does - and never quite governs it. Multiply it out: twenty frameworks, two hundred use cases, a thousand questions per checklist. Four million boxes. Even if you ticked them all, you still wouldn't be governed. You'd just be really really busy.
This primer is the opposite argument, in three moves, written by the author of Singapore's first AI risk management guidelines for the financial sector. For anyone trying to keep control of AI as the number of systems climbs, in a firm, a regulator, or a team of one.
This primer is the gateway to the fuller book, Some Thoughts on Scaling AI Governance.